A systematic search of the biomedical literature was conducted until February 2011 to identify studies evaluating the accuracy of MRI according to the NACs as a measure of the size of the residual tumor. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched by EMBASE.com; Premedline, the Effect Review Summary Database, Heath Technology Assessment (CLHTA) and Cochrane Databases were searched by Ovid. Research terms have been chosen to link MRI to breast cancer and the response to NAC. Keywords and medical headings included “breast cancer,” MRI, MRI, neo-adjuvant and response. The full research strategy has already been reported (Marinovich et al, 2012, 2013). Reference lists were also searched and content experts were consulted to identify other studies. Akazawa K, Tamaki Y, Taguchi T, Tanji Y, Miyoshi Y, Kim SJ, Ueda S, Yanagisawa T, Sato Y, Tamura S, Noguchi S (2006) Preoperative evaluation of residual tumor dilation by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated with neoadjuvanter chemotherapy. Breast J 12 (2): 130-137. The second influential theory is projection, the idea that people project their own attitudes and beliefs onto others.
 This projection idea is not a new concept. It is found in Sigmund Freud`s work on the defence mechanism of projection, the work of D.S. Holmes on attribute projection (1968) and Gustav Ichheisser`s work on social perception (1970).  For example, D.S. Holmes described social projection as the process by which people “try to validate their beliefs by projecting their own properties onto other individuals.”  We have seen that perception of the person is useful in helping us to successfully interact with others. With regard to our previous discussion on attributions for success and failure, if we can determine why we are hurting on one test, we can try to prepare differently, so that we can better for the next one. As successful navigation in the social world is based on accuracy, we can expect our attributes to be pretty good. Although people are often quite specific in their remit – we could perhaps say they are “pretty good” (Fiske, 2003) – they are far from perfect. Indeed, causal attributions, including those relating to success and failure, are subject to the same prejudices as other types of social judgments. Let`s look at some of the ways in which our remits can go wrong. Researchers found that students tend to view good teachers as smarter, friendlier and funnier than less attractive teachers. This tendency to our initial impression of a person influencing what we think globally of them is called the halo effect.
There is a very important general message of perceiving others: let us not be too quick to judge others. It is cognitively easy to think that the poor are lazy, that people who hurt someone else are mean, and that people who say something hard are rude or unpleasant. But these attributions can often over-emphasize the role of the person. This can sometimes lead to harsh assessments of people who don`t really deserve them; We tend to blame the victim, even for events they can`t really control (Lerner, 1980). Sometimes people are lazy, mean or rude, but they can also be victims of situations.